High Energy Slings
High Energy Slings

Dee Newcum

dee.newcum@gmail.com
http://paperlined.org/dev/oss/high_energy_slings/

November 2011

This paper discusses slings that maximize the energy of a projectile. That is, we seek to launch heavier projectiles at higher speeds.

This paper doesn't put much emphasis on accuracy. High-energy slings are often less accurate.[1]

In most situations, sling accuracy is more important than power. Ancient slings were probably used more often against single targets (hunting an animal, or an encounter with a single adversary), rather than scattershot at massed troops.

### Physics

The kinetic energy of a slung projectile, expressed in terms of centripetal force on the sling, is [2]: $$E = {1 \over 2} r F$$ Where $$r$$ is the radius (sling length), $$F$$ is the centripetal force (analogous to a bow's draw weight), and $$E$$ is the launch energy.

Expressing things in terms of draw weight is interesting, because it lets us ignore the details of projectile mass and orbital frequency.[3] At high draw weight, you start to have problems with the slinger not having enough arm strength to maintain a proper slinging technique, or the sling breaking. This is true regardless whether it's a light projectile that's rotating quickly, or a heavy projectile rotating slowly.

An example: One way to estimate the draw weight is to use weaker material of a known breaking strength, and confirm you can break it by using your normal slinging technique. We do this with a 10 foot sling made from 30lb test fishing line. The calculated projectile energy is ~200 joules when the sling breaks. (for Google Calculator, type in "1/2 * 10 feet * 30 pounds force")

### Sling length

As seen above, sling length is very important. After maxing out a slinger's draw weight, the only way to increase projectile energy is to increase sling length.

This makes some intuitive sense. If the benefit of a sling is that it gives mechanical advantage — by lengthening a thrower's arm — then using a sling with more mechanical advantage might be useful in some circumstances.

However, aerodynamic drag is a significant limiting factor on sling length. The longer a sling is, the more the sling body slows the projectile down during spin-up, which ultimately limits maximum orbital frequency.

How do we solve this problem? The answer is to build the thinnest possible sling. Fishing line is easier to work with, but piano wire can be used as well.

### CAUTION

The phrases "high energy" and "piano wire" should make you concerned about safety.

The author learned this lesson the hard way. High forces focused on a thin line means that it can slice through muscle. After you get a lot of force on the line (>20lb draw weight), do not get your off-hand near it.

If you want to abort a launch, DO NOT USE YOUR OFF-HAND TO SLOW THE SLING DOWN. Instead, slow it down by using the opposite pumping movements — imagine that you're trying to get the projectile to spin in the opposite direction. If you're unsure how to do this, practice it before you get a sling spun up to maximum energy.

Another way to abort a launch is to dip the projectile near the ground so that it drags several times.

This warning especially applies to Spectra/Dyneema fishing line, because its soft pliability can fool you into thinking it's safer than piano wire. It's not. Spectra/Dyneema is factually stronger than steel.[4]

### Comet slings

Traditional slings use a pouch and a doubled-over line. In this paper, we explore non-traditional slings called "comet slings".[5] After release, the entire sling body remains attached to the projectile, and it follows the projectile through the air like a comet's tail.

This configuration has some benefits, compared to traditional slings:

• Greatly reduced tangling, because we use one line instead of two.
• No concerns about the projectile being properly seated in the pouch.
• Nearly any projectile can be used, even very oblong ones.
• Less drag during spin-up, because we use one line instead of two.
There are some downsides as well:
• Increased drag during flight. However, since we use fishing line, drag is increased very little.
• Increased cost-per-projectile. This likely makes this design unworkable in a primitive setting.[6] It also means you have an incentive to retrieve all of your projectiles, which is a bit of a pain.
• Increased time to manufacture each projectile. We try to keep construction as simple as possible though.

### Construction

(exploded parts diagram — objects not to scale)

It's important to use fishing line that's stronger than you need, otherwise it will break unexpectedly, your projectile will fly in a random direction, and nearby folks will be endangered. Rule #1 is "always keep control of your weapon".

The strongest fishing line is made from braided Spectra/Dyneema.

Splice each end of the fishing line into the appropriate end-rope, using a needle. Stitch the fishing line through the rope several times. Take care to make sure this sewn connection is secure, since fishing line is slippery and it wants to unravel. Optionally, you can use any fishing knot as a backup knot.

### Simplifications

Barbell (2 lb), water bottle (1¼ lb), grab hook (1 lb), and soup can (1 lb).
Simplifying sling construction is good since you'll make multiple slings.

By far, the biggest simplification is to completely replace the fishing line with thin paracord (thin and very strong rope). By using thin rope, you remove almost all problems associated with high-pressure line (where pressure means the same force concentrated on a much smaller area). There is no longer any need for separate end-ropes that need to be individually tied on. Safety is improved — there is no longer a risk of slicing through muscle. The obvious downside is that drag is increased, both during wind-up as well as mid-flight.

Another option is to keep the fishing line, but eliminate either or both of the end-ropes, and extend the fishing line all the way to the end.

Eliminating the projectile end-rope has a significant downside. The line takes a sharp 90° turn where the stem (the long straight portion that includes the fishing line) enters the constrictor knot. If you use fishing line at this point, this will be the weakest point of the system, and breaks will almost always happen here. Although Spectra/Dyneema is abrasion-resistant, it isn't as strong as rope at this junction, because rope spreads the force over a much larger area — the pressure on the rope is much less.

### Detached handles

When using fishing line, using a detached handle has two benefits: 1) it simplifies construction, because one handle can be reused for many projectiles, and 2) drag is reduced during flight.

For lower pressures (either fishing line + low draw weight, or paracord), a leather glove is an acceptable "handle" (insofar as it protects your fingers from damage).

For higher pressures (fishing line + high draw weight), you can manufacture a handle. However, the rope really is adequate, particularly for larger projectiles where the effect of drag is comparatively less.

The author explored a number of different designs for a manufactured handle. The release/trigger mechanism proved to be tricky, and no good solution has been found yet. The author is still exploring.

### Slinging style

Slingers use several different styles when using standard slings. However, helicopter style is the only viable technique for long slings, when standing on the ground.

If a pit, cliff, or tower can be located, and you can sling atop the tower or immediately adjacent to the pit, then other slinging styles may work. However, in a hunting or combat scenario, fixed towers/pits are usually unavailable. Even if they are available, they're tactically undesirable because they limit mobility.

A tip — during practice sessions, if you tie a 1" wide white ribbon near the handle end, this will make it easier to locate and retrieve projectiles. Without this, it is difficult to accurately see the impact position of the projectile from such a long distance away.

### Calculating energy from range

If the projectile range is known, it is possible to calculate a lower bound on projectile energy: [7] (note: this assumes the slinger is on flat ground) $$E ≥ {1 \over 2} m g d$$

An example query for Google Calculator is .5 * (9.8 m / s^2) * 100 grams * 100 meters.

If the launch angle is known (e.g. by analyzing the frames of a video), then a more exact estimate can be obtained: [8] $$E = {m g d \over 2 sin(2 \theta)}$$

### Force and energy comparisons

By primarily using leg and core muscles,[11] and leaving wrists and elbows in a lax position, hammer throwers can achieve greater draw weights than slingers can.

In contrast, a slinger's technique relies a lot on wrist and elbow motion.
Draw weights for modern bow go up to ~80 lbs. Older war bows have gone as high as 180lbs, and 140lbs was common.[9]

Hammer throw practitioners achieve a projectile energy of ~3000 joules, at the Olympic level.[10] [7] Working backwards, this translates to a draw weight of ~1100 lbs. [TODO: does this pass the smell test?]

We can calculate the energy of the entries listed on the slinging.org range records page:

Slinger Date Sling type Type Mass Throw style Sling length Range Energy Draw weight
Melvin Gaylor *1970  212.6g  349.6m≥364.2J
Vernon Morton *   283.5g  258.2m≥358.7J
SEB  Stone300gSide-Arm130cm~220m≥323.4J≥111.9lbs
Colonel Walker  Orange~454gModified Underhand122cm~130m≥289.2J≥106.6lbs
Douglas02/11/05 Heavy stone~500g  ~90m≥220.5J
LoboHunter02/06/05 Weighted golf balls162.5gUnderhand109cm196m≥156.1J≥64.4lbs
Thomas02/15/05 Softball312g  95m≥145.2J
David Engvall *1992Pouch-less, special releaseDart62g 127cm477.0m≥144.9J≥51.3lbs
David T  Cement ball164g  ~150m≥120.5J
Larry Bray *1982 Stone52g 130cm437.1m≥111.4J≥38.5lbs
Naiyor09/05/11 Lacrosse ball~142gUnderhand66cm~160m≥111.3J≥75.8lbs
Saulius Pusinskas08/08/11Braided, leather pouchBipointed, cement100gPseudo Figure 890cm220m≥107.8J≥53.9lbs
FunSlinger06/05/11 Stone~85gFigure 8208cm~219m≥91.2J≥19.7lbs
Thomas02/15/05 Hard baseball148g 129cm~120m≥87.0J≥30.3lbs
SEB10/05/11 Stone~100gUnderhand80cm~173m≥84.8J≥47.6lbs
Sobieski02/11/11 Stone90gSide arm112cm180m≥79.4J≥31.9lbs
Saulius Pusinskas08/08/11Braided, leather pouchStone70gPseudo Figure 890cm220m≥75.5J≥37.7lbs
LoboHunter02/06/05 Egg-shaped stone85gUnderhand109cm177.3m≥73.8J≥30.5lbs
Stephen Fitzgerald05/15/07 1" steel ball66g 105cm212m≥68.6J≥29.4lbs
NonkinMonk03/01/05 Stones~70g 91cm182.9m≥62.7J≥31.0lbs
LoboHunter02/06/05 Clay gland85gUnderhand109cm148.6m≥61.9J≥25.5lbs
Stephen Fitzgerald03/13/06 Smooth stone~70gOblique Greek105cm~180m≥61.7J≥26.4lbs
Curious_Aardvark2007 Stone~57gSide-Arm~74cm~220m≥61.4J≥37.3lbs
Crater_Caster  Stone~113gUnderhand60cm~107m≥59.2J≥44.4lbs
Colonel Walker10/15/05 Stone~112gUnderhand64cm~107m≥58.7J≥41.3lbs
Alsatian02/10/05  ~90g ~120cm~120m≥52.9J≥19.8lbs
Alsatian02/10/05  ~90g ~100cm~100m≥44.1J≥19.8lbs
Africa_Slinger06/05/11 Golf ball~45gFigure 8107cm~200m≥44.1J≥18.5lbs
Stephen Fitzgerald03/13/06 Golf ball45gFigure 8105cm~190m≥41.9J≥17.9lbs
Mike Greenfield04/05/05 Stone82gNwmanitou's Overhand85cm~100m≥40.2J≥21.3lbs
Jerzy Gasperowicz02/15/05 Light stones~25g  ~250m≥30.6J
Alsatian02/10/05  ~90g ~60cm~60m≥26.5J≥19.8lbs
Naiyor07/05/11 Salt flour glande~56gUnderhand66cm~80m≥22.0J≥15.0lbs
LoboHunter02/06/05 Foos ball42.5gUnderhand109cm88.2m≥18.4J≥7.6lbs
MammotHunter02/15/05 Bipointed, clay34g 94cm101.5m≥16.9J≥8.1lbs
Peter van der Sluys10/16/07Fabriclead, fishing weight15gHelicopter76cm210m≥15.4J≥9.1lbs
Peter van der Sluys10/16/07Fabriclead, fishing weight10gHelicopter76cm200m≥9.8J≥5.8lbs
Peter van der Sluys Woven hempBipointed, clay11g ~50cm119m≥6.4J≥5.8lbs
Peter van der Sluys10/16/07FabricBipointed, clay6gHelicopter76cm180m≥5.3J≥3.1lbs

### Results

The author is a novice slinger, and did not know how to sling before writing this paper. That said, the author was able to achieve ~160 joule launches using a 10 foot sling, after doing ~10 practice sessions over four weeks. Although this doesn't surpass the records listed above, it does come somewhat close, with relatively little practice. This supports the conclusion that this sling configuration makes it easier to launch high-energy projectiles.

(details: $$r$$=10ft, projectile=1 lb grab hook, range=70m, $$\theta$$=~36° (based on the fact that I launched very close to the projectile scraping on the ground behind me))

### Optimizing for projectile range

What is the optimal launch angle, when trying to maximize projectile range? If sling length is held constant, then the classic answer is 45°.

However, if sling length is chosen to be as long as possible, just short of dragging on the ground, then sling length varies with launch angle (assuming helicopter style). With low launch angles, sling length can become much longer. So launch velocities increase with decreasing launch angle.

How does a varying launch velocity affect the optimum launch angle? The author's calculations indicate that lower launch angles are better for range, with very small launch angles being the best. See that page for caveats.

http://paperlined.org/dev/oss/high_energy_slings/optimum_angle.html

### Future research

A similar analysis of staff slings could be done, analyzing their dynamics and kinematics, and using modern materials to build higher energy staff slings.

### Future research

It would be useful to quantify the impact of increased sling body drag on projectile energy. In particular, how much of a difference does Type I Paracord versus Spectra/Dyneema make? Also, how much of a difference does a comet sling versus a doubled-over line make?

### Future research

A computer physics simulator could be configured to help in exploring projectile shape and sling configuration.

Computer simulators are very useful for sling experiments. This is because there's so much variability in real-world field testing — different slingers have different skill levels, and most slingers use different projectiles and slings. Computer simulators eliminate this variability, and allow slingers from around the world to repeat the exact same experiment.

Simulators are also helpful, in that most slingers don't have the equipment to accurately measure how fast their projectiles are going, while measuring speeds and distances in a computer is cheap and easy.

All of the equations in this paper ignore air friction; a physics simulator would allow friction to be accounted for.

### Related work

For information on high-energy slingshots, see Jörg Sprave's work at http://SlingshotChannel.blogspot.com/.

For an analysis of the kinematics of trebuchets, see Donald B. Siano's work at http://AlgoBeautyTreb.com/.

### Notes and references

1. When slingers increase projectile range, accuracy gets decreased. This is a natural consequence of increased range for ALL projectile weapons. For the exact same gun, a shooting target at 200 meters will need to be double the size of a shooting target at 100 meters.

Also, when slingers increase orbital frequency, lateral accuracy gets decreased — release timing errors are exacerbated with increased orbital frequency.

That said, it is possible to retain accuracy while increasing energy. Range and orbital frequency can be kept the same, but sling length (and thus tangential velocity) and projectile mass can be increased, without impacting accuracy.

2. The centripetal force equation is: $$F_{centrip} = {{m v^2} \over r}$$

Solve for velocity: $$v = \sqrt { {r F_{centrip} } \over m }$$

Plug that into the kinetic energy equation, and we get: $$E_{launch} = {1 \over 2} m v^2 = {1 \over 2} m \left({{r F_{centrip}} \over m}\right) = {1 \over 2} r F_{centrip}$$

3. That said, if you do want to calculate it in terms of projectile mass ($$m$$) and orbital frequency ($$\omega$$), it's straightforward — use the centripetal force equation: $$F = m r \omega^2$$

An example Google Calculator query is "1 pound * 10 feet * (360 degrees / 1 second)^2 in pounds force".

4. For tensile strength, Spectra/Dyneema is comparable to steel. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultimate_tensile_strength [TODO: unreliable source])
For strength-to-weight ratio (specific strength), Spectra/Dyneema is 15 times stronger than steel. (http://www51.honeywell.com/sm/afc/products-details/fiber.html)
5. The sport of hammer throw uses the same projectile configuration as comet slings (after release, the thrower's hands are empty), so the terms "hammer throw sling" and "comet sling" can be used interchangeably. However, "comet sling" is used here to clearly indicate that the traditional slinging technique is used.

Hammer throw practitioners spin their body while throwing, which significantly compromises their accuracy,[12] [TODO: source doesn't really support this conclusion] but allows them to use a hand position (wrists and elbows lax) that greatly increases their draw weight.

The author feels that the hammer throw technique compromises accuracy too much, so this paper focuses on a traditional slinging technique. Although we don't focus on accuracy in this paper, we don't want to prevent the possibility of being able to sling both accurately and powerfully.

6. See Russell Miners' discussion of medieval trebuchet triggers. There is no evidence that a knife or axe cutting through a rope was ever used as a trigger. This is despite the fact that the economic investment for trebuchets was much higher than slings, both for the up-front cost, as well as for per-projectile costs. Even in medieval times, rope was apparently not wasted. http://members.iinet.net.au/~rmine/triggers.html
7. The projectile distance equation for flat ground is: $$d = {v_0^2 \over g} sin(2 \theta)$$

The maximum projectile distance occurs with a launch angle of 45°, so we can omit the launch angle by introducing an inequality: $$d ≤ {v_0^2 \over g} sin(2 \cdot 45 ^{\circ} )$$ $$sin(90^{\circ} ) = 1$$ $$d ≤ {v_0^2 \over g}$$

Solve for $$v_0$$: $$v_0 ≥ \sqrt {g d}$$

Plug that into the kinetic energy equation: $$E = {1 \over 2} m v_0^2$$ $$E ≥ {1 \over 2} m g d$$

8. Similar to the above: $$d = {v_0^2 \over g} sin(2 \theta)$$ $$v_0 = \sqrt{ g d \over sin(2 \theta) }$$ $$E = {1 \over 2} m v_0^2 = {m g d \over 2 sin(2 \theta)}$$
9. Strickland, Matthew; Hardy, Robert (2005). "The Great Warbow: From Hastings to the Mary Rose". Sutton Publishing.
10. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hammer_throw#Men.27s_best_throwers_of_all_time indicates that the world record throw is 86.74m. The same page mentions that regulation equipment for men's hammer throw is $$r$$ = 121.5 cm, $$m$$ = 16lb.
11. http://coachr880.com/id92.html
http://coachr880.com/id123.html
(criticism: The claims this paper makes — that horizontal acceleration occurs primarily during the earlier stages of windup — could be easily validated by analyzing overhead video frame-by-frame)
http://ironmanthrows.com/StrengthTrainingfortheHammerThrow.doc
12. A regulation hammer throw field consists of lines that are angled 34.92° from each other; throws have to land between these lines to be considered valid. (http://www.hrsm.sc.edu/JVEM%20Vol%203%20Iss%201/Vol2No1/HammerThrow2.pdf)