Talking about Race, Learning about Racism: The Application of Racial Identity Development Theory in the Classroom
-Beverly Daniel Tatum
...
One common response to the discomfort is to engage in denial of what they are
learning. White students in particular may question the accuracy or currency of
statistical information regarding the prevalence of discrimination (housing, employment, access to health care, and so on). More qualitative data, such as autobiographical accounts of experiences with racism, may be challenged on the basis of their subjectivity.
...
If outright denial of information is not possible, then withdrawal may be. Physical withdrawal in the form of absenteeism is one possible result; it is for precisely this reason that class attendance is mandatory. The reduction in the completion
of reading and/or written assignments is another form of withdrawal. I have found
this response to be so common that I now alert students to this possibility at the
beginning of the semester. Knowing that this response is a common one seems to
help students stay engaged, even when they experience the desire to withdraw.
...
For example, Tom, a White male student, responded with some frustration in
his journal to a classmate's observation that the fact that she had never read any
books by Black authors in any of her high school or college English classes was
an example of cultural racism. He wrote, "It's not my fault that Blacks don't write
books." ... Though Tom's explanation seems quite problematic, it can be
understood in the context of racial identity development theory as a way of reducing his cognitive dissonance upon learning this new race-related information. As
was discussed earlier, withdrawal (accomplished by avoiding contact with people
of color and the topic of racism) is another strategy for dealing with the discomfort
experienced at this stage.
The stages in the racial identity development model:
[1]
[2]
[3]